A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to resume processing immigration applications that were paused under its restrictive policies, thereby protecting hundreds of thousands of immigrants from losing their legal status. The ruling challenges efforts to curtail parole programs and highlights ongoing legal battles over U.S. immigration enforcement.
Federal Judge Blocks Pause on Immigration Benefits
A federal judge in Massachusetts has ordered the Trump administration to lift a pause on processing various immigration applications, ruling that it is not in the public interest for hundreds of thousands of immigrants to lose their legal status in the U.S.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani found that the administration’s suspension of these applications was arbitrary and capricious, violating federal administrative law. The ruling provides relief to immigrants from Afghanistan, Latin America, Ukraine, and other regions whose ability to remain and work legally has been jeopardized by recent policies.
Parole Programs at the Center of the Dispute
The affected immigration programs rely on the legal authority of parole, which allows temporary admission to the U.S. on humanitarian or public interest grounds. The Trump administration had sought to curtail parole programs initiated under the Biden administration, arguing they were broadly abused. Talwani’s order explicitly targets a pause quietly enacted in February that halted the processing of immigration benefits for around 240,000 Ukrainians under the Uniting for Ukraine program and about 530,000 Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans benefiting from another parole policy.
Extension Requests and Family Parole Programs Restored
In addition to lifting the February pause, Talwani ordered the government to end a January suspension that barred consideration of parole extension requests from Afghans, Ukrainians, and others admitted under parole programs. The ruling also protects a longstanding parole program that provides temporary legal relief to immigrant relatives of U.S. service members and veterans, blocking any Trump administration efforts to halt its processing.
Legal and Political Context
The Department of Homeland Security defended the administration’s actions, asserting that the Biden administration abused parole authority, worsening border challenges. However, Talwani emphasized that manufacturing a situation where hundreds of thousands become unlawfully present, unable to work or support families, is not in the public interest. This ruling marks the second time the judge has blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict parole programs, following a similar decision in April that prevented termination of legal status for hundreds of thousands of migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
Broader Implications for Immigrant Communities
The pause and proposed termination of parole programs threatened to force many immigrants into undocumented status or compel them to leave the U.S. The judge’s decision offers a reprieve, allowing affected individuals to maintain lawful presence and continue working. Advocates argue that the administration’s attempts to curtail parole programs disregard the humanitarian and legal protections these policies provide to vulnerable populations.
Ongoing Legal Battles and Supreme Court Appeal
The Justice Department has appealed Talwani’s rulings, requesting the Supreme Court to suspend her orders. The government argues that courts are interfering with executive authority over immigration and foreign policy, which Congress has vested in the Secretary of Homeland Security. Meanwhile, the legal disputes highlight tensions between the Trump administration’s hardline immigration agenda and judicial efforts to uphold procedural and humanitarian standards.
What’s Next?
With the court’s order reinstating the processing of parole applications and extensions, thousands of immigrants can continue to live and work legally in the U.S. However, the administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court signals that the issue remains unresolved. The outcome will have significant consequences for immigration policy, the lives of hundreds of thousands of migrants, and the broader debate over the balance between enforcement and humanitarian protections.
To stay up-to-date and informed, visit our news page, ask your immigration questions on Immigration Question, and get responses from licensed attorneys. For attorneys, streamline your case and lead management when you download the Immigration Question app.
