U.S. Representative LaMonica McIver is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday to face federal charges tied to an incident that took place during a congressional oversight visit to an immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey. The charges, which include assaulting and interfering with federal officers, stem from a May 9 visit to Delaney Hall—a privately operated, 1,000-bed facility contracted by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The charges were brought forward by interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba, a Trump appointee, and include three counts of assault, resisting, and impeding federal officers. Two of these counts carry a potential sentence of up to eight years each, while the third carries a maximum sentence of one year. McIver, a Democrat and former Newark City Council president, has denied any wrongdoing and vowed to defend herself in court.
Video Footage Offers Limited Clarity
Bodycam footage from the event shows McIver in a crowded scene involving officers and other individuals. At one point, her elbows appear to make contact with a federal officer dressed in riot gear. However, the video does not indicate whether the contact was intentional or a byproduct of the chaotic environment.
According to the indictment, McIver allegedly used her forearm to strike an agent and tried to physically interfere with the officer’s actions by grabbing him. She also reportedly attempted to shield the mayor present at the scene from arrest, further escalating tensions.
Legal and Political Tensions
This case marks an unusual instance of a sitting member of Congress being prosecuted on federal assault charges unrelated to corruption or financial misconduct. The indictment comes amid ongoing friction between the Trump administration and Democratic lawmakers over immigration enforcement policies.
Democratic colleagues who accompanied McIver on the visit, including Reps. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Rob Menendez, have voiced strong objections to the charges and questioned the motives behind the prosecution. They cited McIver’s lawful authority as a member of Congress to conduct unannounced inspections of federal immigration facilities —an oversight power explicitly supported by a 2019 congressional appropriation.
McIver’s Background and Congressional Role
Elected in a special election in September following the death of Rep. Donald Payne Jr., McIver later secured a full term in the November elections. At 39, she has quickly become a prominent figure in New Jersey politics. Before her congressional role, she led the Newark City Council and spent several years working in public education.
Looking Ahead
McIver’s arraignment is expected to raise questions not only about the incident itself but also about the broader implications of criminalizing oversight actions by lawmakers. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how future congressional visits to sensitive federal facilities are interpreted and handled by law enforcement. As the legal process unfolds, it will likely continue to stir political debate over immigration policy, congressional oversight, and the separation of powers.
For timely updates and analysis on immigration enforcement and related immigration issues, visit ImmigrationQuestion.com. Get answers to your immigration questions from licensed immigration attorneys. For attorneys, use our mind-blowing 2-in-1 case management software to grow your practice. Download our free app on Google play and App Store.
Resources:
- https://apnews.com/article/lamonica-mciver-newark-new-jersey-immigration-991f84363c403c0ff5c970ad2bee64bb
- https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/06/25/nation/lamonica-mciver-arraignment-assault-charges/
- https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/ap-us-news/ap-us-rep-lamonica-mciver-to-be-arraigned-on-assault-charges-stemming-from-immigration-center-visit/
**Immigration Question is a third-party platform that connects licensed immigration attorneys with users, it is not a law firm. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by USCIS or AILA. Attorneys on this platform are independent and have the discretion to offer a free consultation and/or set their own fees under the law.
