A Massachusetts federal court has become the third jurisdiction to block the Trump administration’s attempt to limit birthright citizenship. This reinforces growing judicial resistance to the policy following a recent Supreme Court ruling that narrowed lower courts’ authority to issue nationwide injunctions.
Third Ruling Reaffirms National Injunction
The U.S. District Court in Massachusetts ruled Friday that a nationwide injunction previously issued against the Trump administration’s birthright citizenship policy remains valid under exceptions outlined by the Supreme Court in its June decision. The court found that challenges brought by a coalition of states met the legal threshold for an injunction with national scope.
The judge maintained that states had demonstrated concrete financial harm resulting from the administration’s efforts to deny citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented or temporary immigrants. According to the ruling, such harm justified maintaining the injunction beyond state borders. The decision follows similar rulings in New Hampshire and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, both of which also determined that the administration’s order could not lawfully take effect pending full adjudication.
Ongoing Legal Dispute Over Fourteenth Amendment
At the center of the legal battle is the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This amendment grants citizenship to all individuals born in the United States. The Trump administration claims that children born to non-citizens are not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. and, therefore, do not qualify for citizenship at birth.
Opponents of the Executive Order argue that the executive branch lacks the authority to redefine constitutional terms. They believe that birthright citizenship is a well-established constitutional right. They also contend that the Executive Order could disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of people and disrupt access to critical services tied to legal status, such as healthcare, education, and disability services.
The Massachusetts court confirmed that only the Supreme Court can reinterpret constitutional provisions of this scale. The court decided that the immediate effects of the executive order on state-administered programs required judicial intervention.
Patchwork Enforcement Rejected by Court
The Department of Justice requested that the injunction be limited geographically to minimize its impact. They referenced the Supreme Court’s June decision that restricted nationwide injunctions. However, the judge found that a limited injunction would not work, given population mobility and the risk of inconsistent legal standards across states.
The court also noted that the federal government did not offer a workable alternative for enforcing the order without causing administrative disruption or burdening affected states. The ruling emphasized that states must maintain consistency in planning and providing services to eligible residents smoothly.
As a result, the Massachusetts injunction remains in effect, consistent with other federal court decisions that have reached similar conclusions about the policy’s constitutionality and implementation.
Looking Ahead
The Trump administration has not yet filed any appeals against the latest rulings. However, legal experts believe the issue will likely return to the Supreme Court soon, considering the conflicting interpretations of constitutional protections and the importance of birthright citizenship. While the legal status of the order remains unsettled, the courts have, for now, prevented the administration from enforcing the restriction on birthright citizenship. Multiple state-led lawsuits remain pending, with further hearings anticipated in Maryland and the District of Columbia.
With federal courts issuing consecutive rulings against the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict birthright citizenship, legal clarity remains pending at the Supreme Court level. Until that point, nationwide protections under the Fourteenth Amendment continue to shield U.S.-born children from changes to their citizenship status.
For timely updates and analysis on immigration enforcement and related immigration issues, visit ImmigrationQuestion.com. Get answers to your immigration questions from licensed immigration attorneys. For attorneys, use our innovative 2-in-1 case management software to grow your practice. Download our free app on Google Play and Apple’s App Store.
Resources:
- https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/video/judge-blocks-trumps-birthright-citizenship-restrictions-in-third-ruling-since-scotus-decision/
- https://apnews.com/article/immigration-birthright-citizenship-trump-3d94d355e1892baab810c9efddd1fd92
- https://blog.immigrationquestion.com/news/federal-judge-moves-to-block-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order-nationwide/
- https://blog.immigrationquestion.com/news/trump-administration-pushes-for-partial-restrictions-on-birthright-citizenship-at-supreme-court/
- https://blog.immigrationquestion.com/news/nationwide-block-on-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order-holds-firm/
- https://blog.immigrationquestion.com/news/fourth-federal-judge-halts-trumps-birthright-citizenship-order-amid-legal-challenges/
**ImmigrationQuestion.com is a third-party platform that serves as a meeting ground between licensed immigration attorneys and people with immigration questions. It is not a law firm. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by USCIS or AILA. Attorneys on this platform are independent and have the discretion to offer a free consultation and/or set their own fees under the law.
