In response to growing legal challenges and public outcry following a second fatal shooting involving federal agents, the Trump administration is reorganizing its leadership in immigration enforcement in Minneapolis.
The change suggests that federal strategies may need to be adjusted as judges, state officials, and local authorities examine the operation’s scope and methodology.
Immigration Leadership Shift Follows Fatal Shooting
Border Patrol commander Gregory Bovino is expected to depart Minneapolis as the Trump administration reorganizes leadership of its immigration enforcement surge.
The move comes days after the fatal shooting of Alex Pretti, an ICU nurse, during a federal operation, intensifying political pressure and legal scrutiny surrounding the mission.
The administration has placed senior immigration official Tom Homan in direct command of enforcement activities in Minnesota, with oversight shifting closer to the White House. The leadership change reflects an effort to stabilize operations amid growing controversy.
Minneapolis Operation Draws National Criticism
Bovino’s tenure overseeing highly visible federal crackdowns in multiple U.S. cities had already drawn criticism from local governments, civil rights groups, and members of Congress.
The increase in enforcement in Minneapolis led to weeks of demonstrations and legal action by local and state authorities. It heightened concerns about federal officers’ behavior.
Calls for accountability were accelerated by the second deadly shooting involving federal agents, which also sparked concerns about the operational plan governing immigration enforcement in residential areas.
Courts Examine Motives and Scope of Enforcement
Federal courts are now weighing whether the immigration operation exceeds constitutional boundaries. Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul have argued that the surge is punitive and aimed at undermining state and local sanctuary policies rather than addressing specific public safety threats.
Judges have questioned the breadth of federal demands made during the operation, including requests for access to state data and expanded enforcement authority, signaling unease over the limits of executive power in immigration enforcement.
Federal Presence Under Judicial Review
While leadership shifts are underway, federal officers remain active on the ground, with thousands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol personnel deployed across the region. Lawsuits before multiple judges seek to reduce the scale of the operation, restrict enforcement tactics, and preserve evidence connected to recent shootings.
The outcome of these cases could influence how similar enforcement surges are conducted in other states.
Looking Ahead
Courts are expected to issue further rulings that may reshape or limit federal immigration operations in Minnesota. Leadership changes, judicial scrutiny, and political pressure are converging at a critical moment for the administration’s enforcement agenda.
Visit ImmigrationQuestion.com for continued monitoring of developments related to DHS Regulations, TPS, immigration enforcement operations, investigations into the use of force, and policy impacts on immigrant communities.
Get answers to your immigration questions from licensed immigration attorneys. For attorneys, use our innovative 3-in-1 case management software to improve your practice. Download our free app on Google Play Store and the Apple App Store.
Resources
**ImmigrationQuestion.com is a networking platform founded by Immigration Attorneys. It serves as a meeting ground for licensed immigration attorneys and people with immigration questions. It is not a law firm. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by USCIS or AILA. Attorneys on this platform are independent and have the discretion to offer a free consultation and/or set their fees under the law.
