A federal judge has ordered the release of a Liberian man arrested during a forceful immigration raid in Minneapolis, finding that federal agents violated constitutional protections. The ruling comes amid intensified immigration enforcement in Minnesota and has renewed scrutiny of arrest procedures used during recent operations.
Judge Finds Constitutional Violations in Arrest
A U.S. District Court judge in Minnesota ordered the release of Garrison Gibson, a Liberian national arrested after immigration agents forcibly entered his home using a battering ram. It was held that there was a violation of Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.
The court noted that the agents entered the residence unlawfully and without a judicial warrant. The court held that such actions failed the constitutional requirements necessary for making an arrest in a residence.
Background of the Minneapolis Enforcement Action
The detention happened at a time of increased immigration enforcement in the state of Minnesota, where federal officials have arrested thousands of immigrants in the last few weeks. Minneapolis has been a focal point of these operations, which have drawn increased public attention and concern.
At the time of the raid, Gibson’s wife and the couple’s young child were inside the home. After his arrest, Gibson was moved through several detention facilities before being held at an immigration detention center in southern Minnesota.
Legal Status and Prior Supervision
Court filings show that Gibson had previously been released under a supervision order. This allowed him to stay in the United States while regularly checking in with immigration authorities. Records show he followed these requirements, including a recent visit to immigration offices just days before his arrest.
The court found that immigration officials did not provide sufficient notice that the supervision order had been revoked and did not provide him with the necessary protections after detention. This further supported the decision to order his release.
Broader Enforcement Climate in Minnesota
The ruling comes as immigration enforcement actions in the Twin Cities have created fear, protests, and increased tension following several recent incidents involving federal agents. These events have intensified the debate over the extent and conduct of immigration operations in the region.
Community advocates and legal observers have raised concerns about the use of aggressive enforcement tactics and their impact on families and neighborhoods already affected by ongoing enforcement.
A Look Ahead
The court’s decision may affect how immigration arrests are made, especially in cases involving individuals previously released under supervision. Additional legal challenges could arise as enforcement activity continues across Minnesota and other areas.
Visit ImmigrationQuestion.com for continued monitoring of developments related to DHS Regulations, TPS, immigration enforcement operations, investigations into the use of force, and policy impacts on immigrant communities.
Get answers to your immigration questions from licensed immigration attorneys. For attorneys, use our innovative 3-in-1 case management software to improve your practice. Download our free app on Google Play Store and the Apple App Store.
Resources
**ImmigrationQuestion.com is a networking platform founded by Immigration Attorneys. It serves as a meeting ground for licensed immigration attorneys and people with immigration questions. It is not a law firm. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by USCIS or AILA. Attorneys on this platform are independent and have the discretion to offer a free consultation and/or set their fees under the law.
