Supreme Court Approves Virginia’s Removal of 1,600 Alleged Noncitizen Voters’ List
The U.S. Supreme Court has approved Virginia’s efforts to remove approximately 1,600 alleged noncitizens from its voter rolls, sparking widespread legal and civic debate. The move has drawn attention from civil rights groups and the Department of Justice (DOJ), who argue the process may infringe on federal election protections and holds the risk of mistakenly purging eligible citizens.
Background on Virginia’s Voter Purge Initiative
The process began under an executive order from Virginia’s Governor, aiming to enhance voter list accuracy by cross-referencing Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) records with the State’s voter registry to flag possible noncitizens. However, this approach has raised concerns about data accuracy, as DMV records are not solely designed to confirm voter eligibility and can often lead to mistaken noncitizen labels, as immigration advocates highlight.
Legal Challenges and DOJ’s Intervention
In October 2024, the DOJ filed a lawsuit against Virginia, claiming the State’s actions potentially violated the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) by engaging in systematic voter purges within the 90-day “quiet period” preceding a federal election. The NVRA includes this provision to prevent last-minute removals that could lead to disenfranchisement and administrative errors. Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke expressed that such practices, especially near Election Day, risk unjustly targeting eligible voters, fueling distrust and confusion among citizens wrongly flagged as noncitizens
The lawsuit argued that Virginia’s purge is especially problematic as it may lead to eligible voters being purged without adequate time to respond to the State’s notifications and prove their citizenship. The DOJ seeks an injunction to prevent Virginia from implementing voter list maintenance programs so close to the election, a request that the Supreme Court ultimately denied in this ruling
Supreme Court’s Decision and Its Implications
Despite the DOJ’s objections, the Supreme Court’s decision to allow the purge to proceed highlights the tension between federal oversight of voting rights and State efforts to maintain accurate voter rolls. Supporters of Virginia’s actions argue that ensuring noncitizens do not participate in elections is essential to maintaining election integrity. Opponents, including civil rights organizations and the DOJ, argue that the purge risks removing eligible voters, particularly when DMV records are used as the primary verification tool.
The Governor of Virginia has said that this removal program promotes clean voter rolls, enhancing the comprehensive approach the State is taking toward fair elections.
Critics warn that this approach could set a precedent for voter suppression if upheld as standard practice across other States, particularly affecting vulnerable groups like immigrants and Indigenous peoples.
Looking Ahead – Supreme Court Approves Virginia’s Removal of 1,600 Alleged Noncitizen Voters’ List
With the elections just a few days away, the Supreme Court’s ruling has intensified debates around voting rights. The case will likely continue to evolve as both the DOJ and civil rights groups seek further legal recourse. The outcome may set new standards for how States address noncitizen voting concerns without infringing upon citizen voting rights.
To stay updated and informed, keep an eye out for our news section or drop your immigration queries for professional attorneys to reply on Immigration Question.
